enapps-enorman commented on pull request #471: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/471#issuecomment-1035421352
> i have to check the code again regarding the handling in the subtree because i thought it was different. my point is that properties somewhere in the subtree should have the same mixin-type checks. @anchela Well, I don't think we can assume that every subtree node would need the same mixin type value. Each subtree node would likely have a unique set of possible properties and a different set of value constraints on those properties. Wouldn't handing this at the oak level become complex if you have to map specific mixintype (or primarytype) to subtree paths? We were using a custom AuthorizableActionProvider component to pre-create the subtree nodes with the right types and appropriate ACLs when the user/group are created to avoid this complexity. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
