thomasmueller commented on code in PR #871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/871#discussion_r1137093877
##########
oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/IndexUpdate.java:
##########
@@ -330,9 +334,14 @@ private void collectIndexEditors(NodeBuilder definitions,
// then we don't need to handle missing handler
if (definition.hasProperty(ASYNC_PROPERTY_NAME) &&
rootState.async == null) {
if (!TYPE_DISABLED.equals(type)) {
- log.warn("Missing provider for nrt/sync index: {}
(rootState.async: {}). " +
- "Please note, it means that index data
should be trusted only after this index " +
- "is processed in an async indexing
cycle.", definition, rootState.async);
+ long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
Review Comment:
I know System.currentTimeMillis() can go backwards, but in this are that's
not a problem.
> not to create confusion.
The problem with nanotime is that it has so many zeroes, and that might be
confusing as well... OK I can try.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
