Hi Since we are updating the min required Java version, shouldn't we move one step ahead and jump to Java 17.
This would also help us in staying ahead of the curve and would make it easy to jump to next LTS i.e. Java 21 in due time. +1 for moving to Git. Cheers Rishabh Daim On 2023/10/11 17:42:48 Julian Reschke wrote: > On 11.10.2023 19:29, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > Hi, > > In general +1 for requiring Java 11 from the next JR release on. > > > > Before doing the actual branching I would love to migrate to Git though. > > Good point - I had that on my TODO list, but forgot about it when I > wrote the mail. > > > That not only eases backporting fixes and switching between branches but > > hopefully also encourages external contributions (although we do already > > have the GitHub mirror). > > Backporting fixes with SVN merge works very well; but that said, I agree > with the other point. > > > It becomes harder nowadays to find good tooling for SVN. > > WDYT? > > I am volunteering for doing the actual SVN -> Git migration with the help > > of ASF INFRA. > > Konrad > > Awesome. We can do that at any point of time, right? > > How about starting a separate mail thread and give people a few days > before deciding? (you'll have my +1). > > Best regards, Julian > >
