Yes, any monitor interface will do. They all have a printstream impl.
> On 12 May 2014, at 19:23, Frank Pedroza <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the PrintStreamStepMonitor on the right path? > http://jbehave.org/reference/stable/javadoc/core/org/jbehave/core/steps/PrintStreamStepMonitor.html > > >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Frank Pedroza <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could you help me understand this a bit more or point me to something that >> explains how I would configure the jbehave framework to support this? >> >> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> JBehave uses the monitor pattern that allows you to honour dependency >>> injection properly. Most logging frameworks rely on static lookup >>> mechanisms. >>> >>> If you want to use a logging framework you can still do so by providing a >>> logging implementation of the relevant interfaces. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> > On 9 May 2014, at 22:09, Frank Pedroza <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm new to the group so sorry if this isn't the right venue for this sort >>> > of question or if this has already been addressed, but why is any of the >>> > JBehave framework using System.out rather than something like slf4j? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> >> -- >> -------------------------------------------- >> Frank M. Pedroza - Software Engineer >> Partnet - Development >> 801.708.5050 >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being >> either proven right or pleasantly surprised. >> -- George F. Will > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------- > Frank M. Pedroza - Software Engineer > Partnet - Development > 801.708.5050 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either > proven right or pleasantly surprised. > -- George F. Will
