I'd personally ask them to change that and point them to source headers policy:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html If that's a problem for them; we can discuss alternatives, but I'd see if they are willing to adjust their own license headers. On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Ignasi Barrera <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I understand the copyright policy [1], there shouldn't be a > copyright notice in the header. The way I understand it, pull requests > are contributions submitted directly to the ASF, so they don't fall > into the "third-party work" category, but I'm not a legal expert; it > would be great if someone could clarify this. > > BTW, Andrew Gaul recently fixed many header files that were licensed > to jclouds-inc. > > > I. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > On 13 May 2014 15:45, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: >> Just noticed this in a PR for vSphere support [1]: >> >> "+<!-- >> + Copyright 2014 Cisco Systems, Inc >> + >> + Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");" >> >> Can we accept such a copyright claim if the remainder of the Apache 2 >> license is included? >> >> ap >> >> [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/364/files
