Both rat and maven-license-plugin do not completely enforce license headers; I found many via Checkstyle:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/371 Unfortunately I could not configure Checkstyle with anything other than an absolute path to the license file. Our multi-module configuration works properly but not across repositories like jclouds-labs. Any ideas on how to make this work or how to properly configure the other two tools? On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:25:20PM +0200, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > As far as I understand the copyright policy [1], there shouldn't be a > copyright notice in the header. The way I understand it, pull requests > are contributions submitted directly to the ASF, so they don't fall > into the "third-party work" category, but I'm not a legal expert; it > would be great if someone could clarify this. > > BTW, Andrew Gaul recently fixed many header files that were licensed > to jclouds-inc. > > > I. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > On 13 May 2014 15:45, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: > > Just noticed this in a PR for vSphere support [1]: > > > > "+<!-- > > + Copyright 2014 Cisco Systems, Inc > > + > > + Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");" > > > > Can we accept such a copyright claim if the remainder of the Apache 2 > > license is included? > > > > ap > > > > [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/364/files -- Andrew Gaul http://gaul.org/
