>From the dependencies perspective, we should be OK there:
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.assertj/assertj-core/1.6.1 http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.assertj/assertj-guava/1.2.0 We exclude the junit dependency (since we use TestNG), it¹s happy with Guava, and I just ran full builds of the following repos with no issues: jclouds jclouds-chef jclouds-cli jclouds-karaf jclouds-labs-google jclouds-labs-openstack /jd On 9/16/14, 10:51 AM, "Andrew Phillips" <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: >> - assertj-core >> - assertj-guava >> >> Any objections? > >Sounds good to me. Do they bring in any libraries that may cause >conflicts for our users..? > >ap
