Great! I will submit a PR with the changes I made to the pom. I agree that assertj should *only* be in test scope, and that is how I currently have it configured.
/jd On 9/16/14, 12:34 PM, "Andrew Gaul" <g...@apache.org> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:51:48PM +0200, Andrew Phillips wrote: >> >- assertj-core >> >- assertj-guava >> > >> >Any objections? >> >> Sounds good to me. Do they bring in any libraries that may cause >> conflicts for our users..? > >We should only include assertj with test scope, so jclouds will not >introduce this dependency for users. I also support adding assertj as a >project-wide dependency based on positive experiences using it >previously and with the glacier provider. > >-- >Andrew Gaul >http://gaul.org/
