+1 FWIW, I am all for the ³remove" versus "update version² approach as well. If the deps are not necessary, let¹s clean them up.
/jd On 9/18/14, 9:23 AM, "Andrew Phillips" <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: >Actually, looking at this [1], it seems like for Karaf we are *not* >pulling in usocket-jna or pageant. Here's an alternative PR applying >Alex' patch which we could consider: > >https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/526 > >If we can test this as working, my vote would be for the "remove" >rather than "update version" patch - the less chance of a problem, the >better ;-) > >Would anyone miss the support for pageant, assuming that's even working? > >ap > >[1] >https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/blob/master/feature/src/main/reso >urces/feature.xml#L439
