TL;DR;

jclouds will stop maintaining vcloud in 1.8.x. We will remove vcloud
(and the vcloud-director labs provider) in version 1.9.0.

Our vcloud codebase is old, unsupported by cloud providers and a
crippling maintenance debt on the project. If we want jclouds to
endure, we have to make difficult decisions such as this.

The removal of vcloud is being tracked in the following jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-780

Best,
-A

Here's a copy of the description of JCLOUDS-780

For over a month, we've discussed the fate of vcloud [1]. For example,
we've already removed all vcloud providers as they no longer work with
version 1.0 [2]. Also users who contact us either run custom forks
[3], or also find features they need missing [4].

Eventhough the replacement code was supposed to be vcloud-director, it
has never left labs, and has too much technical debt to continue
attempting to support [5].

A couple stakeholders have offered they may be able to help [6], or
encourage vmware to add a new api to cover modern products [7].

Good wishes aside, the facts remain that we have 2 aging apis, that
are unsupportable in current form. Keeping vcloud and vcloud-director
codebases limits the project's ability to move forward, so we must
drop them.

Users who wish to continue on either codebase will need to maintain
their own fork.

When it comes time to start vcloud products again, we'll want to start
very small, with at least 2 champions, and some means to keep tests
passing. If we don't, we'll surely repeat history again.

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/4p22wkbrd4mncmss
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-743
[3] http://markmail.org/message/gxcl37zq2pnn22sf
[4] http://markmail.org/thread/ligd5sbkmvoo7vdi
[5] http://markmail.org/thread/s5i6i4nr6f5k5wew
[6] http://markmail.org/thread/5fav2wa6ylxbqpdy
[7] http://markmail.org/thread/q4otznoqoygrz64b

Reply via email to