You can subscribe to the jclouds "notifications" list to get all emails from jira and github comments. Everyting ends up in a ML.
Let's use the subtasks to coordinate the development. Thanks guys! El 27/02/2015 17:16, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" <ilgro...@apache.org> escribió: > On 27/02/2015 17:09, Andrea Turli wrote: > >> Francesco, >> >> thanks again for you interest! >> >> Yes, #135 has been merged few hours ago. I've also update >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664 to track some subtasks >> identified in #135 >> > > Hi Andrea, > that's cool: do you know where JIRA notifications are sent, at least when > issues get created? > > Thanks. > Regards. > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:02 PM Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < >> ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> Set up a GitHub user for this kid and subscribe ot to the project? >>> >>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò<mailto:ilgro...@apache.org> >>> Sent: 2/27/2015 7:54 AM >>> To: dev@jclouds.apache.org<mailto:dev@jclouds.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: Working on Azure compute provider >>> >>> Hi there! >>> >>> Looks like PR 135 was merged today: >>> >>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#issuecomment-76381931 >>> >>> That's good: we will re-base our work on updated jclouds-labs master >>> branch and move forward (still having troubles with live tests, but >>> making some progresses). >>> >>> Can we move here at dev@ discussions like the one above or at least ask >>> infra to setup some sort of github PR mirroring? >>> It would help keeping track of ongoing development efforts (you know, >>> "If it didn't happen on a mailing list, it didn't happen"...). >>> What about opening residual issues as we've been discussing below? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Regards. >>> >>> On 24/02/2015 15:45, Ignasi Barrera wrote: >>> >>>> Sure. I'll have a look at it later today and merge it if everything >>>> looks good. Let's move forward! >>>> >>>> On 24 February 2015 at 15:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò >>>> <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 24/02/2015 15:25, Andrea Turli wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Francesco, >>>>>> thanks for your update and for your effort! >>>>>> >>>>>> I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to >>>>>> >>>>> close >>> >>>> the main pending discussion on >>>>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion- >>>>>> >>>>> diff-24976668 >>> >>>> What about merging #135 as is and moving the discussion mentioned above >>>>> >>>> into >>> >>>> a new JIRA issue (linked to or as subtask of) JCLOUDS-664? >>>>> >>>>> I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks or >>>>>> simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute >>>>>> implmentation. >>>>>> >>>>> Anything goes to me, good! >>>>> Regards. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò >>>>>> <ilgro...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than >>>>>>> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes >>>>>>> >>>>>> and >>> >>>> new features, and is in turn based on the latter. >>>>>>> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual >>>>>>> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an >>>>>>> >>>>>> actual >>> >>>> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution, >>>>>>> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions >>>>>>> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated- >>>>>>> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt >>>>>>> for details) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks >>>>>>> >>>>>> of >>> >>>> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item. >>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks for your interest in jclouds! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> working hard to improve it. >>>>>>>>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the >>>>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST" >>>>>>>> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was >>>>>>>> preferred. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then >>>>>>>>> rebase >>>>>>>>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed. >>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> by >>> >>>> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and >>>>>>>> being as much effective as possible. >>>>>>>> How would do you see this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm already there :-) >>>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> html >>> >>>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò >>>>>>>>> <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi JClouds community, >>>>>>>>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with >>>>>>>>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team >>>>>>>>>> with a >>>>>>>>>> focus on Azure. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]? >>>>>>>>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> change >>> >>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles >>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test >>>>>>>>>> execution. >>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664 >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/ >>>>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/ >>>>>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/ >>>>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/ >>>>>>>>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java >>>>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence >>>>>>>>>> http://www.tirasa.net/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: >>>>>>>>>> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > >
