Hi Francesco,

I added PR 144 supporting virtual machine image operations in feature Api
[1].

[1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn499771.aspx


On 2 March 2015 at 16:42, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>
wrote:

> On 28/02/2015 08:12, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>
>> You can subscribe to the jclouds "notifications" list to get all emails
>> from jira and github comments. Everyting ends up in a ML.
>>
>
> Thanks Ignasi, just subscribed.
>
>  Let's use the subtasks to coordinate the development. Thanks guys!
>>
>
> Fine: we'll keep you updated here about our current activities (e.g.
> making the live test suite succeeding) - which I hope will end up soon with
> a pull request.
>
> I have also seen another pull request on Azure provider (#144): any
> background on this?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>  El 27/02/2015 17:16, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" <ilgro...@apache.org>
>> escribió:
>>
>>  On 27/02/2015 17:09, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>
>>>  Francesco,
>>>>
>>>> thanks again for you interest!
>>>>
>>>> Yes, #135 has been merged few hours ago. I've also update
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664 to track some
>>>> subtasks
>>>> identified in #135
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Andrea,
>>> that's cool: do you know where JIRA notifications are sent, at least when
>>> issues get created?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>>   On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:02 PM Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
>>>
>>>> ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Set up a GitHub user for this kid and subscribe ot to the project?
>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò<mailto:ilgro...@apache.org>
>>>>> Sent: ‎2/‎27/‎2015 7:54 AM
>>>>> To: dev@jclouds.apache.org<mailto:dev@jclouds.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Working on Azure compute provider
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi there!
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like PR 135 was merged today:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#issuecomment-76381931
>>>>>
>>>>> That's good: we will re-base our work on updated jclouds-labs master
>>>>> branch and move forward (still having troubles with live tests, but
>>>>> making some progresses).
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we move here at dev@ discussions like the one above or at least
>>>>> ask
>>>>> infra to setup some sort of github PR mirroring?
>>>>> It would help keeping track of ongoing development efforts (you know,
>>>>> "If it didn't happen on a mailing list, it didn't happen"...).
>>>>> What about opening residual issues as we've been discussing below?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/02/2015 15:45, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Sure. I'll have a look at it later today and merge it if everything
>>>>>> looks good. Let's move forward!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 February 2015 at 15:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>> <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 24/02/2015 15:25, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Francesco,
>>>>>>>> thanks for your update and for your effort!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  close
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> the main pending discussion on
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  diff-24976668
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about merging #135 as is and moving the discussion mentioned
>>>>>> above
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> a new JIRA issue (linked to or as subtask of) JCLOUDS-664?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute
>>>>>>>> implmentation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Anything goes to me, good!
>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <ilgro...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
>>>>>>>>> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of
>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
>>>>>>>>> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  actual
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
>>>>>>>>> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-
>>>>>>>>> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
>>>>>>>>> for details)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some
>>>>>>>>> subtasks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Hi Francesco,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>> working hard to improve it.
>>>>>>>>>>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
>>>>>>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs
>>>>>>>>>> REST"
>>>>>>>>>> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
>>>>>>>>>> preferred.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> rebase
>>>>>>>>>>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work
>>>>>>>>>> (even
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  by
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> being as much effective as possible.
>>>>>>>>>> How would do you see this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
>>>>>>>>>> I'm already there :-)
>>>>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>> msg05877.
>>>>>>>>>> html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>>>>>>> <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   Hi JClouds community,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's
>>>>>>>>>>>> team
>>>>>>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on Azure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  change
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
>>>>>>>>>>>> execution.
>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>>>>>>>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>>>>>>>>>>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>
>

Reply via email to