+1 Speaking of promotions, can we consider jclouds-docker as mature as profitbricks ?
Best, Andrea Il giorno mar 16 feb 2016 18:33 Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> ha scritto: > ProfitBricks is one of the most mature providers in labs and it's complete > with regard to the compute abstraction, so I'd say promote it! > El 16/2/2016 2:58 p. m., "Reijhanniel Jearl Campos" <devc...@apache.org> > escribió: > > > Hi! > > > > It's now a year (and a month) since the ProfitBricks provider[1] started, > > and so far ComputeService live tests are passing[2] and is now properly > > configured[3]. With the profitbricks-rest[4] in progress in the labs, I > > think it would make sense to now promote this provider. > > > > For completeness, non-blocking related issues are JCLOUDS-1058[5], and > the > > use of cloud-init ready images[6] (if available). > > > > With that said, I was hoping to receive a go signal to promote this > > provider. :) > > > > Thanks! > > RJ > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/tree/master/profitbricks > > [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/145 > > [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/224 > > [4] > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/tree/master/profitbricks-rest > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1058 > > [6] https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/msg/60156332/ > > >
