Docker is stable, but the main concern is how fast they deploy new versions
of the api and which level of backwards compatibility they have. Does our
current version work with the latest api?

I don't really know how up to date the provider is, as I'm not an active
user. Perhaps some users can share their thoughts, or we can ping them at
the IRC channel if they don't show up here.

Anyway, the fast api releases is something we can't control, so IMO it
doesn't male sense to retain Docker in labs just for that reason. Given its
current stable status, I'd say we can promote it too.
El 16/2/2016 6:39 p. m., "Andrea Turli" <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> escribió:

> +1
>
> Speaking of promotions, can we consider jclouds-docker as mature as
> profitbricks ?
>
> Best,
> Andrea
>
> Il giorno mar 16 feb 2016 18:33 Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> > ProfitBricks is one of the most mature providers in labs and it's
> complete
> > with regard to the compute abstraction, so I'd say promote it!
> > El 16/2/2016 2:58 p. m., "Reijhanniel Jearl Campos" <devc...@apache.org>
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > It's now a year (and a month) since the ProfitBricks provider[1]
> started,
> > > and so far ComputeService live tests are passing[2] and is now properly
> > > configured[3]. With the profitbricks-rest[4] in progress in the labs, I
> > > think it would make sense to now promote this provider.
> > >
> > > For completeness, non-blocking related issues are JCLOUDS-1058[5], and
> > the
> > > use of cloud-init ready images[6] (if available).
> > >
> > > With that said, I was hoping to receive a go signal to promote this
> > > provider. :)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > RJ
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/tree/master/profitbricks
> > > [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/145
> > > [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/224
> > > [4]
> > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/tree/master/profitbricks-rest
> > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1058
> > > [6] https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/msg/60156332/
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to