I think it is an important one, let's cut a RC2 and test again. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi! > > While testing the new Azure ARM security group extension I've found a > small issue here [1]. Basically we are not dealing properly the "all > protocols" firewall rules, and will always fail to create them. > > Given that the SecurityGroupExtension (along with Packet and Vagrant) > is one of the important features we're releasing in 2.0.1, I'd like to > propose to cancel the RC1 and cut a RC2 with a fix for that. > The fix is pretty straightforward, and I'd also have a look at the > vagrant feature thing in Karaf (although all tests passed locally for > me). > > WDYT? The change would only affect labs. I don't pretend to be > releasing the other unrelated repos again, so I hope to be able to > have the RC2 prepared tonight/early tomorrow. > > > Cheers! > > I. > > > [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/ > azurecompute-arm/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/ > arm/compute/extensions/AzureComputeSecurityGroupExtension.java#L217 > > On 19 February 2017 at 20:59, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote: > > I attached integration test results against aws-s3, azureblob, b2, > > filesystem, glacier, google-cloud-storage, rackspace-cloudfiles-us, s3 > > (dreamhost), and transient. > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:05:24PM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > >> This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for > >> Apache jclouds 2.0.1. > >> Please use this thread for discussion of issues uncovered in the RC, > >> questions you may have about the RC, etc. > >> > >> If you want to help validating the release, you can follow these > instructions: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Validate+a+Release > >> > >> > >> Thank you! > > > > -- > > Andrew Gaul > > http://gaul.org/ >
