I tracked the jclouds-karaf test failure to using Java 8 for the build. All 
tests are failing, but only the last one is being reported.
Looks like Karaf 2.3.11 is not compatible with Java 8 and there's not much we 
can do about it at this point.
Andrea's PR [1] addresses this problem for future releases by upgrading Karaf 
to an up-to-date version which can work with Java 8.

Note that jclouds-karaf artifacts are still usable with Java 8. The problem is 
with the test setup.

Svet.

[1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/92


> On 21.02.2017 г., at 22:43, Ignasi Barrera <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> BTW, the CI build passes:
> https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/
> 
> Can you try building it with a clean Maven repo?
> 
> On Feb 21, 2017 9:40 PM, "Ignasi Barrera" <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'll have it fixed.
>> 
>> Didn't fail for me (OSX) but perhaps I had something cached in the local
>> maven repo.
>> 
>> I'll cancel the vote in a while and push all the fixes.
>> 
>> On Feb 21, 2017 7:53 PM, "Andrea Turli" <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm seeing the same problem from osx.
>>> 
>>> Shall we fix that for RC2?
>>> 
>>> Il mar 21 feb 2017 19:40 Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>>> Can anyone reproduce the failing karaf vagrant symptoms when running the
>>>> verify script?  I am running on Ubuntu 14.04 using JDK 1.8.0_121.  I
>>>> attached the logs.
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 05:05:19PM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>> 
>>>>> While testing the new Azure ARM security group extension I've found a
>>>>> small issue here [1]. Basically we are not dealing properly the "all
>>>>> protocols" firewall rules, and will always fail to create them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Given that the SecurityGroupExtension (along with Packet and Vagrant)
>>>>> is one of the important features we're releasing in 2.0.1, I'd like to
>>>>> propose to cancel the RC1 and cut a RC2 with a fix for that.
>>>>> The fix is pretty straightforward, and I'd also have a look at the
>>>>> vagrant feature thing in Karaf (although all tests passed locally for
>>>>> me).
>>>>> 
>>>>> WDYT? The change would only affect labs. I don't pretend to be
>>>>> releasing the other unrelated repos again, so I hope to be able to
>>>>> have the RC2 prepared tonight/early tomorrow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1]
>>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/azurecom
>>> pute-arm/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/arm/
>>> compute/extensions/AzureComputeSecurityGroupExtension.java#L217
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 19 February 2017 at 20:59, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> I attached integration test results against aws-s3, azureblob, b2,
>>>>>> filesystem, glacier, google-cloud-storage, rackspace-cloudfiles-us,
>>> s3
>>>>>> (dreamhost), and transient.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:05:24PM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>>>>>>> This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for
>>>>>>> Apache jclouds 2.0.1.
>>>>>>> Please use this thread for discussion of issues uncovered in the
>>> RC,
>>>>>>> questions you may have about the RC, etc.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you want to help validating the release, you can follow these
>>>> instructions:
>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Validate+a+Release
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Andrew Gaul
>>>>>> http://gaul.org/
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Gaul
>>>> http://gaul.org/
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to