Regarding the promotion of the ARM provider (I'd pretty much like that to happen too), should we fix first any of the open issues? https://s.apache.org/76Fq
On 5 September 2017 at 09:49, Jim Spring <jmspr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Andrea - > > Just to clarify re: azure-arm — promotion from jclouds-labs to jclouds as a > non-labs provider? That would be excellent and I’m willing to contribute > the time to make sure that happens. As in another thread - there is some > new work going on, but it’s new features. I corrected some issues I saw > re: Oauth after some refactoring. > > Let me know how I can help. > > I’m for this “promotion” and new release. > > -jim > > > On September 5, 2017 at 12:31:25 AM, Andrea Turli (andrea.tu...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Hi! > > It's been about two months since jclouds 2.0.2 and I'd like to propose (and > volunteer) to release 2.1.0. > > In fact I don't think 2.0.3 is what we want now, but open to suggestions. > > There are many improvements to Azure ARM which I think it is now mature > enough to be promoted and several bug fixes and improvements to other > providers that will be for sure useful for users. > > What do you guys think? > > Best, > Andrea
