Andrea, Ignasi - Some of the new work is the scale set api stuff that was mentioned by Julio in a separate thread.
I'll take a look at the list (and comments today) and follow up after. -Jim On Sep 5, 2017 2:20 AM, "Andrea Turli" <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jim, > > great! > > Ignasi, > > sounds good to me. Let's focus on azure-arm issues for this new release. > > Jim, > > is your new work fixing one of the issues related to azure-arm mentioned by > Ignasi? It would be great to have another "tester" while we iron last > issues for that provider! > > Thanks, > Andrea > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Regarding the promotion of the ARM provider (I'd pretty much like that > > to happen too), should we fix first any of the open issues? > > https://s.apache.org/76Fq > > > > On 5 September 2017 at 09:49, Jim Spring <jmspr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Andrea - > > > > > > Just to clarify re: azure-arm — promotion from jclouds-labs to jclouds > > as a > > > non-labs provider? That would be excellent and I’m willing to > contribute > > > the time to make sure that happens. As in another thread - there is > some > > > new work going on, but it’s new features. I corrected some issues I > saw > > > re: Oauth after some refactoring. > > > > > > Let me know how I can help. > > > > > > I’m for this “promotion” and new release. > > > > > > -jim > > > > > > > > > On September 5, 2017 at 12:31:25 AM, Andrea Turli ( > > andrea.tu...@gmail.com) > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > It's been about two months since jclouds 2.0.2 and I'd like to propose > > (and > > > volunteer) to release 2.1.0. > > > > > > In fact I don't think 2.0.3 is what we want now, but open to > suggestions. > > > > > > There are many improvements to Azure ARM which I think it is now mature > > > enough to be promoted and several bug fixes and improvements to other > > > providers that will be for sure useful for users. > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > > > Best, > > > Andrea > > >
