Thanks Andrea! I've added my edits. @demobiox feel free to rewrite-them as appropriate.
Regarding the private tag, I've added the vendor mentions there. It is not a big deal. I mean, from a foundation perspective, when the board minutes are published (which include the project reports) it is good that there is no mention to companies that could be misunderstood as not being vendor neutral. Projects appear there all together and reports have no context directly available unless one goes to the mailing lists. However, our wiki is public and the mention in the private section can be read there. It is OK, as we always discuss this openly. We also have a test provider thanks page in the wiki, which is OK too. Internal stuff that should not be really disclosed, should be in private sections in the board report and definitely not in the wiki, but I think it is OK to mention the vendors here just as we do. On 10 April 2018 at 06:01, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: > I've added some notes to April's report at [1] >> > > Thanks, Andrea! I've made some minor text edits, but the content overall > should be unchanged. One point regarding the paragraph about Dimension, 1&1 > and Aliyun: there was some previous board feedback about how to refer to > companies in the public section of board reports, but I don't recall if the > guidance to mention companies by name in a <private> section only applied > to concerns, or to all company mentions in general. > > Ignasi, Andrew G., do you happen to recall what the advice there was? > > Regards > > ap >
