Excellent! Thank y'all guys! I think I'll send today EOB (in ~7 hours)
Please feel free to amend/contribute more Andrea On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Andrea! > > I've added my edits. @demobiox feel free to rewrite-them as appropriate. > > Regarding the private tag, I've added the vendor mentions there. It is not > a big deal. I mean, from a foundation perspective, when the board minutes > are published (which include the project reports) it is good that there is > no mention to companies that could be misunderstood as not being vendor > neutral. Projects appear there all together and reports have no context > directly available unless one goes to the mailing lists. > > However, our wiki is public and the mention in the private section can be > read there. It is OK, as we always discuss this openly. We also have a test > provider thanks page in the wiki, which is OK too. > > Internal stuff that should not be really disclosed, should be in private > sections in the board report and definitely not in the wiki, but I think it > is OK to mention the vendors here just as we do. > > On 10 April 2018 at 06:01, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: > > > I've added some notes to April's report at [1] > >> > > > > Thanks, Andrea! I've made some minor text edits, but the content overall > > should be unchanged. One point regarding the paragraph about Dimension, > 1&1 > > and Aliyun: there was some previous board feedback about how to refer to > > companies in the public section of board reports, but I don't recall if > the > > guidance to mention companies by name in a <private> section only applied > > to concerns, or to all company mentions in general. > > > > Ignasi, Andrew G., do you happen to recall what the advice there was? > > > > Regards > > > > ap > > >
