Excellent! Thank y'all guys!
I think I'll send today EOB (in ~7 hours)
Please feel free to amend/contribute more
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Andrea!
> I've added my edits. @demobiox feel free to rewrite-them as appropriate.
> Regarding the private tag, I've added the vendor mentions there. It is not
> a big deal. I mean, from a foundation perspective, when the board minutes
> are published (which include the project reports) it is good that there is
> no mention to companies that could be misunderstood as not being vendor
> neutral. Projects appear there all together and reports have no context
> directly available unless one goes to the mailing lists.
> However, our wiki is public and the mention in the private section can be
> read there. It is OK, as we always discuss this openly. We also have a test
> provider thanks page in the wiki, which is OK too.
> Internal stuff that should not be really disclosed, should be in private
> sections in the board report and definitely not in the wiki, but I think it
> is OK to mention the vendors here just as we do.
> On 10 April 2018 at 06:01, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote:
> > I've added some notes to April's report at 
> > Thanks, Andrea! I've made some minor text edits, but the content overall
> > should be unchanged. One point regarding the paragraph about Dimension,
> > and Aliyun: there was some previous board feedback about how to refer to
> > companies in the public section of board reports, but I don't recall if
> > guidance to mention companies by name in a <private> section only applied
> > to concerns, or to all company mentions in general.
> > Ignasi, Andrew G., do you happen to recall what the advice there was?
> > Regards
> > ap