Just the binary archives, yeah - the source bits are still there, and the RC is otherwise unchanged.
A. On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 16, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'll yank it, then. > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for your persistence with the release, just to clarify are you just > yanking the jclouds-cli-assembly-1.6.1-incubating* or working on a new RC? > I am in the middle of my review and so far only have non-blocking > suggestions. Will post notes and vote in the next couple of hours. > > Suresh > > > > > > A. > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Something maybe someone will complain on general incubator@ is the > >>> content of NOTICE file in > >>> jclouds-cli-assembly-1.6.1-incubating.zip/tar.gz > >>> It doesn't contain reference to others included binaries with ASF > >>> license (as guava etc). > >>> but IANAL and that's in DEPENDENCIES. > >>> So +1 (IPMC binding) for me. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Yeah, I agree with Olivier. > >> I purposefully did not review -assembly as it's a binary, and thus not > >> part of your release. I really think that combining a convenience > >> binary in the same place as the release artifacts is just inviting > >> confusion and more places to receive criticism, especially while you > >> are in the incubator. Again - it's not a release artifact, but no need > >> to cloud the issue. > >> > >> --David > >> > >
