It is not. I'd say it should be "any versions we know it's there in", but often, especially for new functionality and the like, we can just say that it affects the most recent version on its train.
A. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Phillips <[email protected]>wrote: > No. If the bug exists in 1.6.0, it exists in 1.6.0. =) >> > > OK, so "Affects Version(s): 1.6.1" is *not* supposed to imply "affects all > versions up to and including 1.6.1"? > > In that case, should one include all the previous versions (up to some > sensible limit) affected by the bug, since in many cases things broken in > e.g. 1.5.10 are also broken in older versions of 1.5.x? What would "some > sensible limit" be in that situation? > > Thanks! > > ap >
