> here are still cases that the code doesn't handle (e.g. if you add a > multipart blob called 'foo' and a single part blob > called 'foo/bar' then when you download 'foo' it will incorrectly include the > contents of 'foo/bar')
Just out of curiosity: is there any reason we didn't handle these cases in this PR? If possible, I'd rather isolate any remaining failures under a new issue and, if necessary, modify the current issue to reflect whatever fixes we've actually made. Does that sound reasonable? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/123#issuecomment-23339352
