Digging a little deeper into this, it turns out that we actually already *have* a commits@ [1] *and* an issues@ [2] mailing list. I'm assuming dev@ is signed up to issues@; at least, that's what appears in the Reply-To: for me.

After Dies' and Andrew G's comments, my proposal would thus be to:

1) Create a notifications@ mailing list (or rename issues@ if that is possible, to preserve the history) 2) Request for commits@ to be deleted and notifications@ to be signed up for ASF Git commit alerts in its place 3) Use notifications@ in place of dev@ for all JIRA, ASF Git, GitHub, BuildHive and DEV@cloud alerts 4) Leave it up to individual developers to sign up for notifications@, i.e. *not* to subscribe dev@ to that list by default

Assuming nobody has any concerns/objections about this, I'd plan to start creating the appropriate INFRA issues on Fri 6th Sep. Hopefully that will give everyone enough time to comment.

@mentors: is this kind of "just a discussion thread" approach appropriate here, or would something like this better be handled by a formal [VOTE]..?

Regards

ap

[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-commits/
[2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-issues/

Reply via email to