On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Andrew Phillips <[email protected]> wrote: >> Personally I am -0.5 on the idea of doing away with commits@. First, >> it will never go away, all of that history in the list will have to be >> preserved for posterity. Second, it's something of a design pattern at >> the ASF - virtually every project has commits@ and it's almost an >> expectation. There are also many places that assume a commits@ exist. > > > Then let's keep it ;-) As far as I am aware, dev@ is not subscribed to the > list in any case, so it's not actually contributing to the mail load on dev@ > anyway. > > @David: do you any thoughts or similar reservations about issues@, i.e. the > proposal to replace it with the more general notifications@
No personal reservations about that. Do understand that the historical issues@ will stay around forever. > @mentors: is there any easy way for us to determine the membership of the > various mailing lists..? Yep - any of the moderators can send a email to [email protected] and receive a list of all subscribers. --David
