Simon,
As someone who did not use 0.9.0, do you not think that we ought to move
cautiously?
Fixing the JENA-256 is a more major investigation and having fixed it
needs testing, if indeed, it is a regression rather than being more
careful, correctly, about the data - i.e. 0.9.0 may have been wrong.
The workaround for JENA-260 has been confirmed, and hopefully the proper
fix will be soon too.
Andy
On 19/06/12 15:23, Simon Helsen (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13396795#comment-13396795
]
Simon Helsen commented on JENA-260:
-----------------------------------
right, like the performance regression in JENA-256 (that will be quite visible
for clients who came from 0.9.0)
