On 19/06/12 16:40, Simon Helsen wrote:
Right now, it just startling that in the span of a few weeks, a
serious performance regression got introduced and that it is not
understood.
The choice of language is yours.
On a side note: you seem to believe that 256 will be difficult to
fix.
I said I think it needs a decent chunk of time to investigate; anyone
can do that, or start that or even poke around and see what's what.
It was reported last Thursday at 16:48 (BST) after several rounds of
email starting last Wednesday (15:06 BST) necessary to refine the issue
from the original report. Likely, any change will need more than
functional testing.
So, two, nearly three, whole "working" days so far.
Andy
