I don't have much of an opinion. Whichever you think is best. I think as long as it's still available somewhere (and it looks like archive.a.o does that already) and it doesn't break people who may be using it as a Maven dependency (or is there no way around this?).
+1 on a non-incubator LARQ release, even if there are no changes except removing "incubator" -Stephen On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > (after some prompting by infra) > > We have still got > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/ > > I've removed the old artifacts (actually, taken a copy of everything) for > stuff now released as a TLP. This leaves LARQ there. > > To complete the clean up we could do one of: > > 1/ put all the incubator artifacts into svnpubsub then immediately delete > them. Effect: they never appear in /dist/jena/ and, as I understand it, > never go to archive.a.o/dist/jena > > 2/ As (1) but expose for 4 (? 24) hours so archive.apache.org puts them in > its dist/jena area and then delete them. > > Effect: They appear briefly in /dist/jena/ and get archived in > archive.a.o/dist/jena > > (I'm assuming they go in with the current layout binaries/ and source/ > layout, not that of the incubator releases per rmodule > > 3/ (2) except layout is /dist/jena/incubator/... i.e exact layout as is but > in a different location. > > 4/ Leave as is - leave larq in /dist/incubator/jena/ > > 5/ Something else. > > For LARQ, can be do a 1.0.1 release to get it out withour "-incubating"? > > Thoughts? > > Andy
