On 01/08/12 17:21, Stephen Allen wrote:
I don't have much of an opinion. Whichever you think is best. I
think as long as it's still available somewhere (and it looks like
archive.a.o does that already) and it doesn't break people who may be
using it as a Maven dependency (or is there no way around this?).
Maven is not affected. The artifacts from incubation went under
org.apache.jena so their version has the "-incubating".
Their version isn't changing - just the location of the files in web
download from /dist
archive.a.o has them under /dist/incubator/jena anyway already. It's
hard to find unless you know the Apache structure.
It's whether a user can find them easily from /dist/jena (sym links are
not encouraged). And find LARQ if not released very soon.
Andy
+1 on a non-incubator LARQ release, even if there are no changes
except removing "incubator"
-Stephen
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
(after some prompting by infra)
We have still got
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/
I've removed the old artifacts (actually, taken a copy of everything) for
stuff now released as a TLP. This leaves LARQ there.
To complete the clean up we could do one of:
1/ put all the incubator artifacts into svnpubsub then immediately delete
them. Effect: they never appear in /dist/jena/ and, as I understand it,
never go to archive.a.o/dist/jena
2/ As (1) but expose for 4 (? 24) hours so archive.apache.org puts them in
its dist/jena area and then delete them.
Effect: They appear briefly in /dist/jena/ and get archived in
archive.a.o/dist/jena
(I'm assuming they go in with the current layout binaries/ and source/
layout, not that of the incubator releases per rmodule
3/ (2) except layout is /dist/jena/incubator/... i.e exact layout as is but
in a different location.
4/ Leave as is - leave larq in /dist/incubator/jena/
5/ Something else.
For LARQ, can be do a 1.0.1 release to get it out withour "-incubating"?
Thoughts?
Andy
