[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13468485#comment-13468485
]
Ian Dickinson commented on JENA-333:
------------------------------------
The rest of the DAML support is long gone in Jena, so I suggest these classes
get removed as soon as practicable. At the very least we should deprecate them
this cycle and remove them next cycle. In practice, I strongly doubt anyone
would notice if we just removed them now.
In the meantime, I would like to think that it would be possible to exclude a
certain class from Javadoc generation, but a quick look at the Maven javadoc
configuration page [1] suggests that you can only exclude by package name, not
by class.
[1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/javadoc-mojo.html
> Using javadoc 7 causes warning exception in build (DAMLVocabulary, DAML_OIL)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-333
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-333
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build, Onotology API
> Affects Versions: Jena 2.7.4
> Environment: Java 7 (1.7.0_07) Linux 64 bit. (but not Java 1.6.0_24)
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
>
> Under java7, the build of jena core gets two stacktraces (marked as warning)
> in javadoc production. Unclear if the javadoc output is materially affected.
> The following two files are:
> com/hp/hpl/jena/vocabulary/DAMLVocabulary.java
> com/hp/hpl/jena/vocabulary/DAML_OIL.java
> It's unclear as to whether DAML_OIL.java problems maybe due to implementing
> DAMLVocabulary and nothing more.
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/javadoc \
> -classpath fuseki-server.jar \ -- just a source of compiled Jena and
> all dependencies
> -encoding utf-8 \
> -d jdoc I.java
> The core problem is the form:
> -----------------------------------------------------
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.Resource ;
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.Property ;
> public interface I
> {
> public Resource Property();
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------
> where Property is a class and a method name, which is legal, it just breaks
> javadoc (standard doclet).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
