[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13469412#comment-13469412
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-333:
------------------------------------
I haven't checked on the consequence of ignoring the build error - stand-alone
you get one blank page but maybe whether later classes also are missing.
We can live with two missing pages.
If there is no other DAML in Jena any more, I think removal is in order.
I deleted the vocabularies to see what breaks:
reasoner - DAMLMicroReasonerFactory
ontapi - DAML_OILProfile
OntResourceImpl.
Can these be cleaned up now? Is it just a case of removing old junk?
ARP and the RDFXML unparser know about DAML vocabulary. We could move the
vocabularies to be internal and do a rename of the painful Property().
For now:
1/ Classes marked deprecated
2/ removed from some common prefixes
> Using javadoc 7 causes warning exception in build (DAMLVocabulary, DAML_OIL)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-333
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-333
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build, Onotology API
> Affects Versions: Jena 2.7.4
> Environment: Java 7 (1.7.0_07) Linux 64 bit. (but not Java 1.6.0_24)
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Minor
>
> Under java7, the build of jena core gets two stacktraces (marked as warning)
> in javadoc production. Unclear if the javadoc output is materially affected.
> The following two files are:
> com/hp/hpl/jena/vocabulary/DAMLVocabulary.java
> com/hp/hpl/jena/vocabulary/DAML_OIL.java
> It's unclear as to whether DAML_OIL.java problems maybe due to implementing
> DAMLVocabulary and nothing more.
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/javadoc \
> -classpath fuseki-server.jar \ -- just a source of compiled Jena and
> all dependencies
> -encoding utf-8 \
> -d jdoc I.java
> The core problem is the form:
> -----------------------------------------------------
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.Resource ;
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.Property ;
> public interface I
> {
> public Resource Property();
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------
> where Property is a class and a method name, which is legal, it just breaks
> javadoc (standard doclet).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
