given that there are pre-release activities going on, I'll check if I also observe the issue around tdbloader3 or anything else for that matter.
Simon From: Simon Helsen/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA To: [email protected] Date: 10/09/2012 09:37 AM Subject: Re: initial test results Andy, no, sorry, when I say internal testing, I mean running internal junit suites which you don't have access to as well as performance suites on top of client products which has the same problem. Since everyone here can run the regular Jena dev tests, I wasn't paying attention to them (but I should -> the last time I ran it I had an issue with building Fuseki, but I was too busy to investigate at that point) Simon From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 10/06/2012 02:37 PM Subject: Re: initial test results On 05/10/12 15:34, Simon Helsen wrote: > We did some initial tests with one of our clients and there are no obvious > functional regressions compared to 2.7.1. We also did not observe any > major performance regressions and in fact, observed slight to significant > write improvements (heavily depending on the scenario). We'll keep you > posted if we find anything else. Our baseline for comparison is 2.7.1 > > Simon > Excellent - thanks. I take it you didn't run the dev tests on Windows - there's some bizarrity going on with tdbloader3 which I doubt is of any use to you -- see JENA -289 -- looks like it is a fault with the test, not the code, and the code is tdbloader3 specific anyway. Andy
