Andy, I vaguely recall this was also discussed at the time.
I just opened an internal defect, but I am not sure what it will take to get a fix since we are currently not blocked by this ourselves. I am not aware of our clients using xsd:yearMonthDuration, although that can change of course. We'll see what they say. As for the experiments: 1) qexpr "'P2Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration - 'P1Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" : fails with the same NPE 2) qexpr "'P2Y4M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration - 'P1Y2M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" : fails with the same NPE 3) qexpr "'P1DT10H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration - 'P1DT5H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration ": works fine 4)qexpr "'P2Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration + 'P1Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration": fails with the same NPE 5)qexpr "'P2Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration + 'P1Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration": fails with the same NPE 6)qexpr "'P2Y4M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration + 'P1Y2M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration": fails with the same NPE 7)qexpr "'P1DT10H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration + 'P1DT5H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration ": works fine So, the problem seems to sit in xsd:yearMonthDuration Simon From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 10/10/2012 03:27 PM Subject: Re: running dev tests On 10/10/12 19:06, Simon Helsen wrote: > thanks Andy. Now, I repeated the process with the latest, but there are 2 > tests which suffer from the same problem and it looks like the check was > added for one of them and it behaves as expected. This is what I see on > the console: > > Running com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.TS_Expr > 14:03:33 WARN TestNodeValueOps :: **** IBM JVM does not support > xsd:ye > arMonthDuration_xsd:dayTimeDuration Good > Tests run: 1023, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.75 > sec <<< > FAILURE! Bad. I was too quick fixing one ... but hold on: nv_sub_22 is 'P2Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration - 'P1Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration which is XSD F&O section 10.6.2 op:subtract-yearMonthDurations i.e. legal and defined. is there a bug report to IBM Java about this? Could you try the following expressions with arq.qexpr: # sub_22 qexpr "'P2Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration - 'P1Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" # More fully specified qexpr "'P2Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration - 'P1Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" # year and month qexpr "'P2Y4M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration - 'P1Y2M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" # day-time qexpr "'P1DT10H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration - 'P1DT5H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration " The "+" versions should work as well: qexpr "'P2Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration + 'P1Y'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" # More fully specified qexpr "'P2Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration + 'P1Y0M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" # year and month qexpr "'P2Y4M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration + 'P1Y2M'^^xsd:yearMonthDuration" # day-time qexpr "'P1DT10H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration + 'P1DT5H'^^xsd:dayTimeDuration " Andy > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Test set: com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.TS_Expr > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tests run: 1023, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.751 > sec <<< FAILURE! > nv_sub_22(com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.TestNodeValueOps) Time elapsed: > 0.006 sec <<< ERROR! > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.xerces.jaxp.datatype.AbstractDurationImpl.addDuration(Unknown > Source) > at > org.apache.xerces.jaxp.datatype.AbstractDurationImpl.add(Unknown Source) > at javax.xml.datatype.Duration.subtract(Unknown Source) > at > com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.nodevalue.NodeValueOps.subtractionNV(NodeValueOps.java:185) > at > com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.TestNodeValueOps.testSub(TestNodeValueOps.java:155) > at > com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.TestNodeValueOps.testSub(TestNodeValueOps.java:147) > at > com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.expr.TestNodeValueOps.nv_sub_22(TestNodeValueOps.java:96) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:88) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:613) > at > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) > at > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263) > at > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:69) > at > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:48) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60) > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50) > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:292) > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128) > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60) > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50) > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:292) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:236) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:134) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:113) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:88) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:613) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74) > > > > > From: > Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> > To: > [email protected] > Date: > 10/10/2012 09:31 AM > Subject: > Re: running dev tests > > > > On 10/10/12 14:06, Simon Helsen wrote: >> maven version: 3.0.3 (I guess I could upgrade to 3.0.4, which seems to > be >> the latest) > > I'm running 3.0.4 (although my instinct is that this is not the issue > because the error includes "maven-assembly-plugin:2.2.1" which is the > same). No idea currently where the .* comes from. > >> >> The IBM JRE can be detected like this: >> >> private boolean isIBMJRE() { >> String vmName = System.getProperty("java.vm.name"); >> return vmName != null && vmName.equals("IBM J9 VM"); >> } >> > > Thanks - I've tweaked the test so it catches NPE and warns, but does not > cause a test failure. > > If it is fixed so as to throw IllegalStateException, the test is silent. > > Andy > > > >
