My vote is a +1 --------------------
Checking carried out + does everything work on MS Windows? Not tested + does everything work on OS X? Tested as working + is the GPG signature fine? Yes for all artifacts + are the checksums correct? Yes for all artifacts + is there a source archive? Yes + can the source archive really be built? Yes + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? Yes, both source and binary artifacts checked + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? Yes all necessary attributions are present + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? All dependencies with changes remain under ASLv2 or ASF Category A approved licenses and are already noted in L&N where appropriate. Therefore our L&N are good + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? Yes, successfully built from check out of tag Rob On 02/06/2014 12:33, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.11.2 (with Fuseki artifact >1.0.2). > >Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > >Staging repository: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1002/ > >Proposed dist/ area: >http://people.apache.org/~rvesse/jena-2.11.2/ > >Keys: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > >SVN tag: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.11.2 > >Dependency Changes since previous release: > >jena-parent: >- new: org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient-cache (tracks httpclient >version) >- Apache parent 13 -> 14 >- slf4j 1.6.4 -> 1.7.6 >- log4j 1.2.16 -> 1.2.17 >- jsonld-java 0.3 -> 0.4 >- httpclient 4.2.3 -> 4.2.6 >- Lucene/solr 4.3.1 -> 4.6.1 (was in jena-text, now in jena-parent) > >jena-spatial: >- com.spatial4j 0.3 -> 0.4 > >jena-fuseki: >- jetty 8.1.11.v20130520 -> 8.1.14.v20131031 > >Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >This vote will be open to the end of > > Thursday, 5th June 2014, 23:59 UTC > >(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > >Rob > > >Checking needed: > >+ does everything work on MS Windows? >+ does everything work on OS X? >+ is the GPG signature fine? >+ are the checksums correct? >+ is there a source archive? >+ can the source archive really be built? >+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? >+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have >LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? >+ does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > >
