+1
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.11.2 (with Fuseki artifact > 1.0.2). > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1002/ > > Proposed dist/ area: > http://people.apache.org/~rvesse/jena-2.11.2/ > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > SVN tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.11.2 > > Dependency Changes since previous release: > > jena-parent: > - new: org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient-cache (tracks httpclient > version) > - Apache parent 13 -> 14 > - slf4j 1.6.4 -> 1.7.6 > - log4j 1.2.16 -> 1.2.17 > - jsonld-java 0.3 -> 0.4 > - httpclient 4.2.3 -> 4.2.6 > - Lucene/solr 4.3.1 -> 4.6.1 (was in jena-text, now in jena-parent) > > jena-spatial: > - com.spatial4j 0.3 -> 0.4 > > jena-fuseki: > - jetty 8.1.11.v20130520 -> 8.1.14.v20131031 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This vote will be open to the end of > > Thursday, 5th June 2014, 23:59 UTC > > (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Rob > > > Checking needed: > > + does everything work on MS Windows? > Yes > + does everything work on OS X? > + is the GPG signature fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive really be built? > Yes > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > Yes > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > Yes > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have > LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > > Yes
