On 02/06/14 17:24, Claude Warren wrote:
I have an implementation of Apache Configuration [1] that sites on top of a
Resource.
This allows simple java access to configuration options specified in RDF
documents.
I was thinking of contributing it to the com.hp.hpl.jena.util package.
Does anyone object?
Not me.
Would
org.apache.jena.util.
be better as we attempt to move away from com.hp? chh.jena.util is
mainly internal stuff.
Actually, this feel like a new module "jena-utils" "jena-commons" or
whatever but I don't whatelse would go in it at the moment.
I don't suppose this works with assemblers?
If there were an assembler that created a
org.apache.commons.configuration.Configuration, it would be useful to have.
Andy
Claude
[1]
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/apidocs/index.html
