I think it will work with an assembler. I'll fire up a jena-commons (things that make jena useful outside of standard stuff) as opposed to jena-utils (which sounds like things that are used across jena modules)
Claude On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/06/14 17:24, Claude Warren wrote: > >> I have an implementation of Apache Configuration [1] that sites on top of >> a >> Resource. >> >> This allows simple java access to configuration options specified in RDF >> documents. >> >> I was thinking of contributing it to the com.hp.hpl.jena.util package. >> >> Does anyone object? >> > > Not me. > > Would > > org.apache.jena.util. > > be better as we attempt to move away from com.hp? chh.jena.util is mainly > internal stuff. > > Actually, this feel like a new module "jena-utils" "jena-commons" or > whatever but I don't whatelse would go in it at the moment. > > I don't suppose this works with assemblers? > > If there were an assembler that created a > org.apache.commons.configuration.Configuration, > it would be useful to have. > > Andy > > > >> Claude >> >> [1] >> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/apidocs/index.html >> >> > > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
