On 9 Sep 2014, at 14:59, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/09/14 14:39, Damian Steer wrote: >> >> On 9 Sep 2014, at 12:50, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Claude +1'ed and I'm OK with this plan. >>> >>> Is everyone else OK with it? (please "+1/0/-1") >> >>> If so, I'll call a VOTE for moving trunk. >>> >>> 1/ Move the code to git >>> 2/ Repackage com.hp.hpl.jena -> org.apache.jena >>> 3/ Declare jena-3.0-alpha-1 (not a release - just POM version set.). >>> 4/ Starting making changes >>> (like RDF 1.1 details - invalidates persistent data). >> >> To be clear, is the plan to branch for 3.0? Will there be parallel 2.x work? >> >> Damian >> > > In my mind, two branches. (names?) > > Realistically, there is going to be overlap of 3.0 and 2.12.x - > jena-3.0-alpha-1 is not a replacement for the main project.
As expected, but best to check. +1 Damian
