[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14539752#comment-14539752
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-938:
-------------------------------------

Github user afs commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/58#issuecomment-101256776
  
    Good point.  I wasn't able to catch on this PR before the JENA-938 ones 
emerged over the weekend so you have got ahead of me and everyone else.  My 
apologies.
    
    Finding time has to be balanced with $dayjob and life.
    
    The project has not traditionally had such policies decided upfront, they 
emerge. Now may be a good time to capture them now they have emerged. I am not 
keen on defining such things too early because such discussions focus on the 
controversial points yet they c an be a small, important part of the whole.  
Instead, having concrete code to talk about means focusing on what has the most 
benefit.
    
    Would you like to draft a proposal and email dev@? And then progress to 
adding some pages to the website.
    



> Clean up dead code
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-938
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Jena
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.0.0
>            Reporter: A. Soroka
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: cleanup, jena
>
> This is an umbrella task to which several PRs will be attached, each 
> containing "clean up" for some modules in Jena. Each PR will contain only 
> non-controversial emendations, such as the removal of unused imports or 
> unthrown exceptions. Specifically disallowed are the removal of actual logic 
> or methods. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to