[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14552742#comment-14552742
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-938:
-------------------------------------
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/62#issuecomment-103971350
No problemo. Because it was a single commit, it was no harder than a `git
reset` to before that commit and then some tap dancing between `git add`ing
changes, committing them and making PRs from the commits.
Does it seem reasonable to you to go forward to making some
module-by-module PRs that remove unused `private` methods? Then people familiar
with each module in question could decide whether the removed code was really
dead or whether it has some potential future use. I would expect that at least
some of it will be genuinely removable, right?
> Clean up dead code
> ------------------
>
> Key: JENA-938
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Jena
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.0.0
> Reporter: A. Soroka
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: cleanup, jena
>
> This is an umbrella task to which several PRs will be attached, each
> containing "clean up" for some modules in Jena. Each PR will contain only
> non-controversial emendations, such as the removal of unused imports or
> unthrown exceptions. Specifically disallowed are the removal of actual logic
> or methods.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
