+1 Built and tested on Windows 10.
On Saturday, July 25, 2015, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on a release of Jena 3.0.0 with Fuseki 1.3.0 and Fuseki > 2.3.0. > > This is the first release candidate for this release. > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1009/ > > Proposed dist/ area: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > Git commit (browser URL): > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=53d59bd3179b90f41cb53969e2b64340fcb66e76 > > NB - Text wrapping may mangle the above URL > > Git Commit Hash: > 53d59bd3179b90f41cb53969e2b64340fcb66e76 > > Git Commit Tag: > jena-3.0.0-rc1 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This vote will be open to at least the end of > > Tuesday, 28th July 2015, 23:59 UTC > > (96 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > This is a major release. If you expect to check the release but the > the 96 hour limit does not work for you, please email within the > schedule above with an expected time. > > Thanks, > > Andy > > Checking needed: > > + does everything work on Linux? > + does everything work on MS Windows? > + does everything work on OS X? > + is the GPG signature fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive really be built? > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? >
