Yes it should.  and thx

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

> The dropdown on the front page for javadoc still says "Security" - should
> that be "Permissions"? (Assuming "yes" and I will change it).
>
>         Andy
>
> On 26/07/15 12:02, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I assume the javadocs are not updated on the staging site until release is
>> performed?  Otherwise I am missing where the Permissions documentation is
>> created (rather than the old security name)
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  On 25/07/15 21:34, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>
>>>  Is there a staging documentation to go with this release?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> jena.staging.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   On 25/07/15 21:08, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    Proposed dist/ area:
>>>>>
>>>>>       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  There is a slight variation to the release process here.  Instead of
>>>>> a
>>>>> copy of the proposed dist/ area in people.apache.org, this RC used the
>>>>> development svn area on dist.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Like all projects, we have two areas dev/jena and release/jena. The
>>>>> latter
>>>>> is copied to www.apache.org/dist/jena.
>>>>>
>>>>> The advantage is that svn mv can be used to go from vote bytes to
>>>>> release
>>>>> bytes.
>>>>>
>>>>> (Our release documentation hasn't not been updated yet to mention this)
>>>>>
>>>>>           Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Reply via email to