Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/134#discussion_r58941531
--- Diff:
apache-jena-osgi/jena-osgi/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/osgi/Activator.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+package org.apache.jena.osgi;
+
+import org.apache.jena.system.JenaSubsystemRegistry;
+import org.apache.jena.system.JenaSubsystemRegistryBasic;
+import org.apache.jena.system.JenaSystem;
+import org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator;
+import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext;
+
+public class Activator implements BundleActivator {
+
+ /*
+ * Based on
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/spi-fly/spi-fly-examples/spi-fly-example-provider-consumer-bundle/src/main/java/org/apache/aries/spifly/pc/bundle/Activator.java
+ * the Activator#start() waits for bundle extension by Aries SPI Fly,
configures JenaSystem logging and requests for initialization.
+ */
+ public void start(BundleContext context) throws Exception {
+
+ Thread t = new Thread(new Runnable() {
+ @Override
+ public void run() {
+ try {
+ Thread.sleep(500);
+ } catch (InterruptedException e) {
+ }
+ setUpJena();
+ }
+ });
+ t.start();
+ }
+
+ private void setUpJena() {
+ JenaSubsystemRegistry r = new JenaSubsystemRegistryBasic() {
+ @Override
+ public void load() {
+ super.load();
+ }
+ };
--- End diff --
I agree that shading in `xercesImpl` is kind of⦠_shady_. (Hah!) But it
would be worth making some effort to make plain to folks who have relied on it
that they are going to have to make sure that it's available in their OSGi
framework/container, just we don't have a bunch of people finding the same
bundle resolution problem over and over.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
