[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15570239#comment-15570239
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-576:
-------------------------------------

Github user afs commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151
  
    New branch : [http_op_2](https://github.com/afs/jena/tree/http_op_2)
    
    Green line!
    
    This is PR#151, the clean-ups in Jena master and some server control for 
jena-jdbc-driver-remote.
    
    In particular, the pooling `HttpClient` is reset when the server is 
stop/started.
    
    Notes:
    
    1. The `UnsupportedOperationException` has gone away and I don't know why.
    1. (not new) the "WithAuth" tests are marked "Ignore" due to exhausting 
ports. Maybe we should have a few tests for auth at some time.
    
    Other:
    
    1. jena-jdbc uses the plugin `com.mycila.maven-license-plugin` ... except 
this gets it wrong! The comment must start `/**` not just `/*` which we use 
elsewhere. It also runs late, whereas the RAT runs early. I suggest we remove 
this plugin as it duplicates functionality.
    2. jena-jdbc overrides the maven-source-plugin version for no reason I can 
see.
    3. Is aspect4j really needed anymore? It is quite out of date.
    



> Upgrade Apache HTTP Client to 4.3
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>          Components: ARQ
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.0
>            Reporter: Rob Vesse
>            Assignee: Rob Vesse
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> As of 2.11.0 ARQ centralizes all HTTP operations through HttpOp which relies 
> on Apache HTTP Client.  Currently we are using 4.2.3 while the latest stable 
> release is actually 4.3.1
> Therefore we should look at upgrading our code to use the latest version 
> which may entail some refactoring since there appears to have been some 
> breaking changes across the minor version bump which users have seen in usage 
> - e.g. 
> https://github.com/pyvandenbussche/sparqles/issues/9#issuecomment-27220738



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to