ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-576:

Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:

    Holy moly, @afs , thanks for the huge assist! I was out yesterday (Yom 
Kippur) and am now catching up. I will leave comments specific to the HTTP 
question on the new PR, but I will try to speak to the other points here.
    1. I am certainly happy to see a spurious plugin go. I have no problem with 
including that change in this package of changes, if that's okay with everyone 
else. Or it could be a quick separate ticket/commit, to keep thing straighter 
in the history.
    2. I have no idea why `maven-source-plugin ` is overridden. Baggage from 
long-ago when this material was imported into the main code base?
    3. I haven't seen AspectJ used anywhere, but I haven't been all through the 
`jdbc` code. Same as the first point-- I have no problem removing it here or 

> Upgrade Apache HTTP Client to 4.3
> ---------------------------------
>                 Key: JENA-576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-576
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>          Components: ARQ
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.0
>            Reporter: Rob Vesse
>            Assignee: Rob Vesse
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
> As of 2.11.0 ARQ centralizes all HTTP operations through HttpOp which relies 
> on Apache HTTP Client.  Currently we are using 4.2.3 while the latest stable 
> release is actually 4.3.1
> Therefore we should look at upgrading our code to use the latest version 
> which may entail some refactoring since there appears to have been some 
> breaking changes across the minor version bump which users have seen in usage 
> - e.g. 
> https://github.com/pyvandenbussche/sparqles/issues/9#issuecomment-27220738

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to