I got a total crackup almost instantly (jena-parent):

https://gist.github.com/ajs6f/a1ff77fc683cba319257e7b80ba6e8b0

Looks like a problem with the Javadoc plugin, so upstream of us. I might try it 
out with some other projects to see what I get.


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 2.791 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-12-09T09:51:29-05:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 26M/87M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:jar (attach-javadocs) on 
project jena-parent: Execution attach-javadocs of goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:jar failed: An API 
incompatibility was encountered while executing 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:jar: 
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: null

---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library

> On Dec 9, 2016, at 8:41 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> If anyone is interested in trying to build Jena with java9 ...
> 
> Oracle are running a major effort around JDK9 and looking for any and all 
> feedback from open source projects.
> 
>    Andy
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: JDK 9 b148 including a refresh of the module system is available on 
> java.net
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 10:05:52 +0000
> From: Rory O'Donnell <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> JDK 9 build b148 <https://jdk9.java.net/download/> includes an important 
> Refresh of the module system [1] , summary of changes are listed here 
> <http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/changes/jdk-9+148.html>.
> 
> *This refresh includes a disruptive change that is important to understand.
> 
> *For those that have been trying out modules with regular JDK 9 builds then 
> be aware that `requires public` changes to `requires transitive`. In 
> addition, the binary representation of the module declaration 
> (module-info.class) has changed so that you need to recompile any modules 
> that were compiled with previous JDK 9 builds.
> 
> As things stand today in JDK 9 then you use setAccessible to break into 
> non-public elements of any type in exported packages. However, it cannot be 
> used to break into any type in non-exported package. The current specified 
> behavior was a compromise for the initial integration of the module system. 
> It is of course not very satisfactory, hence the #AwkwardStrongEncapsulation 
> issue [2] on the JSR 376 issues list. With the updated proposal in the JSR, 
> this refresh changes setAccessible further so that it cannot be used to break 
> into non-public types, or non-public elements of public types, in exported 
> packages. Code that uses setAccessible to hack into the private constructor 
> of java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup will be disappointed for example.
> 
> This change will expose hacks in many existing libraries and tools. As a 
> workaround then a new command line option `--add-opens` can be used to open 
> specific packages for "deep reflection". For example, a really popular build 
> tool fails with this refresh because it uses setAccessible + core reflection 
> to hack into a private field of an unmodifiable collection so that it can 
> mutate it, facepalm! This code will continue to work as before when run with 
> `--add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED` to open the package java.util 
> in module java.base to "all unnamed modules" (think class path).
> 
> *Any help reporting issues to popular tools and libraries would be 
> appreciated. *
> 
> A debugging aid that is useful to identify issues is to run with 
> -Dsun.reflect.debugModuleAccessChecks=true to get a stack trace when 
> setAccessible fails, this is particularly useful when code swallows 
> exceptions without any logging.
> 
> 
> Rgds,Rory
> 
> 
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-November/005276.html 
> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-experts/2016-October/000430.html>
> [2] 
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/issues/#AwkwardStrongEncapsulation
> 
> -- 
> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
> Quality Engineering Manager
> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
> 
> 

Reply via email to