Subject line needs to include [VOTE].
There is a dependency change for json-ld to version 0.9.0 (same license).
.... else looks good so far!
Andy
On 01/02/17 16:09, A. Soroka wrote:
Hello, Jena-folks!
Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC
members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do
really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I
will investigate fast.
This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear,
and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
Proposed distributions:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
Git tag:
jena-3.2.0-rc1
4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
ajs6f (A. Soroka)
Checking needed:
• Does everything work on MS Windows?
• Does everything work on OS X?
• Is the GPG signature okay?
• Is there a source archive?
• Can the source archive really be built?
• Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and
binary artifacts)?
• Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
• Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
