Okay, folks! The vote is complete, and the results are straightforward: 3 binding +1 votes, and no other binding votes.
I will begin the process of promoting the release candidate to a release, but not until tomorrow morning. Thanks, everyone! --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Osma Suominen <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Successfully built the source distribution on Linux. > > -Osma > > 01.02.2017, 18:09, A. Soroka kirjoitti: >> Hello, Jena-folks! >> >> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0. >> >> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from >> PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ >> to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you >> can bet I will investigate fast. >> >> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2. >> >> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, >> and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers). >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/ >> >> Proposed distributions: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/ >> >> Keys: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >> >> Git tag: >> jena-3.2.0-rc1 >> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c >> >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >> >> This vote will be open to the end of >> >> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC >> >> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind! >> >> ajs6f (A. Soroka) >> >> >> Checking needed: >> >> • Does everything work on MS Windows? >> • Does everything work on OS X? >> • Is the GPG signature okay? >> • Is there a source archive? >> • Can the source archive really be built? >> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source >> and binary artifacts)? >> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Osma Suominen > D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist > National Library of Finland > P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) > 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO > Tel. +358 50 3199529 > [email protected] > http://www.nationallibrary.fi
