Osma, you might want to take a look at Fedora Commons: http://fedorarepository.org/
which is actually the project through which I came to work on Jena. It might be a good option for you. The biggest qualm I have about an LDP implementation for Jena is that many people may want to store opaque bitstream resources (what LDP calls LDP-NR, "non-RDF" resources) in their LDP instance. That seems outside the bounds for Jena. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Feb 14, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Osma Suominen <[email protected]> wrote: > > 14.02.2017, 16:43, A. Soroka kirjoitti: > >> Thoughts? Is anyone else interested in bring an optional LDP component to >> Fuseki (or perhaps independently of Fuseki, a la jena-ldp)? > > I think a LDP feature in Fuseki (or outside) would be very good to have, even > if I don't currently have a specific use case in mind. In fact, I looked at > the existing LDP implementations a while ago, since I need a platform for > publishing a relatively large amount (~40M triples to start with) of > bibliographic Linked Data. I mostly liked the LDP API but was a bit > disappointed with the implementations. Apache Marmotta looked very promising, > but they seem to have problems with developer resources and making a release. > Also the performance was not very good as the PostgreSQL based storage layer > is pretty heavy. > > At the moment I have put LDP aside and I'm instead considering using the RDF > HDT suite of tools, for example hdt-fuseki (a version of Fuseki that can > serve read-only data directly from HDT files), and then building the > necessary APIs on top of that (perhaps using Elda). > > -Osma > > -- > Osma Suominen > D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist > National Library of Finland > P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) > 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO > Tel. +358 50 3199529 > [email protected] > http://www.nationallibrary.fi
