> On Feb 14, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Osma Suominen <[email protected]> > wrote: 14.02.2017, 17:03, A. Soroka kirjoitti: >> Osma, you might want to take a look at Fedora Commons: >> >> http://fedorarepository.org/ >> >> which is actually the project through which I came to work on Jena. It might >> be a good option for you. > > Thanks for the tip. It was on my radar, but seemed to have a different focus > than what I was looking for, far more than just a LDP triple store. I will > take a closer look!
It does offer a lot more, but it might still be scoped enough and quickly scalable enough for your immediate needs. Obviously, even though I commit for it, it doesn't do all my LDP needs because I am here talking about doing another impl! :) >> The biggest qualm I have about an LDP implementation for Jena is that many >> people may want to store opaque bitstream resources (what LDP calls LDP-NR, >> "non-RDF" resources) in their LDP instance. That seems outside the bounds >> for Jena. > > Right, that's not really Jena. However, a RDF-only LDP implementation would, > IMHO, make sense and could probably still be very useful. Well, we have pretty almost all the parts in place. Andy, do you think this would make sense as a kind of "extension" for Fuseki or better as an independent component? I'm inclined to the latter, in hopes that a lot of the HTTP machinery could be handled very simply by an off-the-shelf JAX-RS library, and I am already familiar with JAX-RS, whereas Fuseki's HTTP machinery is a bit opaque to me at the moment. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library
